ArticleScientific reports2024
Drivers of geophagy of large-bodied amazonian herbivorous and frugivorous mammals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geophagy in Gibraltar Barbary macaques is a primate tradition anthropogenically induced.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Indigenous Perspectives on the Co-management of a Regional Conservation Area in the Peruvian Amazon.Environmental management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mineral licks, critical for the survival of many large-bodied mammals in the Amazon, serve as keystone resources that influence the behavior and ecological dynamics of these species. This study presents the most comprehensive analysis to date on the drivers of geophagy-the consumption of soil by animals-at mineral licks in the Peruvian Amazon. Using a combination of camera traps and soil analyses from 52 mineral licks, we examined the visitation patterns of six large-bodied mammals: the black agouti (Dasyprocta fuliginosa), paca (Cuniculus paca), collared peccary (Pecari tajacu), Brazilian porcupine (Coendou prehensilis), lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris), and red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus). Our results reveal that mineral licks provide essential nutrients, particularly sodium (Na), which may be deficient in the diets of frugivorous species such as agouti, paca, and red howler monkey, supporting the mineral supplementation hypothesis. Conversely, the toxin adsorption hypothesis, which posits that animals consume soil to mitigate dietary toxins, was most strongly supported for the herbivorous Brazilian porcupine. The omnivorous collared peccary and the mixed-diet tapir exhibited complex interactions between soil characteristics, suggesting that both mineral supplementation and toxin adsorption play roles in their geophagy. This study highlights the importance of mineral licks for the conservation of Amazonian mammals, emphasizing their role in supporting biodiversity by providing critical nutritional resources that enhance species fitness and ecological resilience. Our findings underscore the need for the protection of these sites, which are integral not only to the survival of individual species but also to the health of the broader Amazonian ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.