ArticleScientific reports2024
Automatic detection and counting of wheat spike based on DMseg-Count.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wheat spike and spikelet detection and counting from high-resolution digital imagery using YOLO with Oriented Bounding Boxes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Efficient and accurate tiller counting of hand-collected samples using images of straw bundles.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Bidirectional state space modeling for lightweight and robust wheat head detection in complex agricultural environments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FEWheat-YOLO: A Lightweight Improved Algorithm for Wheat Spike Detection.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- DASNet a dual branch multi level attention sheep counting network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automatic detection and counting of wheat seedling based on unmanned aerial vehicle images.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The automatic detection and counting of wheat spike images are of great significance for yield prediction and variety evaluation. Therefore, accurate and timely estimation of spike numbers is crucial for wheat production. However, in actual production, due to the susceptibility of wheat spike images to factors such as lighting conditions, shooting angles, occlusion, and overlap, the contour and features of wheat spike is unclear, which affects the accuracy of automatic detection and counting of wheat spike. In order to solve the above problems and further improve the accuracy of wheat spike counting, an improved wheat spike counting model DMseg-Count was proposed by enhancing local contextual supervision information based on existing target object counting model DM-Count. Firstly, wheat spike local segmentation branch was introduced to improve the network architecture of DM-Count, so as to extract the local contextual supervision information of wheat spike. Secondly, an element-by-element point multiplication mechanism was designed to fuse global and local contextual supervision information of wheat spike. Finally, the total loss function was constructed to optimize the model. The test results showed that the mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) of the proposed DMseg-Count model were 5.79 and 7.54, respectively, which were 9.76 and 10.91 higher than the standard distribution matching for crowd counting (DM-Count) model. Compared with other deep learning models, the proposed DMseg-Count model can detect wheat spike image in challenging situations, and has better computer vision processing capabilities and performance evaluation detection effect. In summary, the proposed DMseg-Count model can effectively detect wheat spike and has good counting performance, which provides a new method for automatic counting of wheat spike and yield prediction in complex field environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.