ArticleScientific reports2024
Lightweight convolutional neural network for chest X-ray images classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for pneumonia diagnosis: a systematic review of multimodal learning, fusion strategies, and explainability.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Hybrid deep learning framework for image restoration in Fso systems affected by log-normal fading.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prognosis of pediatric bacterial pneumonia: current advances and challenges.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Adaptive Normalization Enhances the Generalization of Deep Learning Model in Chest X-Ray Classification.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we developed a lightweight and rapid convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture for chest X-ray images; it primarily consists of a redesigned feature extraction (FE) module and multiscale feature (MF) module and validated using publicly available COVID-19 datasets. Experiments were conducted on multiple updated versions of the COVID-19 Radiography Database, a publicly accessible dataset on Kaggle. The database contained images categorized into three classes: COVID-19 coronavirus, viral or bacterial pneumonia, and normal. The results revealed that the proposed method achieved a training accuracy of 99.85% and a validation accuracy of 96.28% when detecting the three classes. In the test set, the optimal results were 96.03% accuracy for COVID-19, 97.10% accuracy for viral or bacterial pneumonia, and 97.86% accuracy for normal individuals. By reducing the computational requirements and improving the speed of the model, the proposed method can achieve real-time, low-error performance to help medical professionals with rapid diagnosis of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.