Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39613761›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Face mask identification with enhanced cuckoo optimization and deep learning-based faster regional neural network.

Binay Kumar Pandey, Digvijay Pandey, Mesfin Esayas Lelisho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Binay Kumar PandeyDepartment of Information Technology, College of Technology, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology Pantnagar, Uttrarakhand, India. binaydece@gmail.com.
Digvijay PandeyDepartment of Technical Education, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. digit11011989@gmail.com.
Mesfin Esayas LelishoDepartment of Statistics, College of Natural and Computational Science, Mizan-Tepi University, Tepi, Ethiopia. mesfinesayas@mtu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A mask identification and social distance monitoring system using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) in the outdoors has been proposed for a health establishment. The above approach performed surveillance of the surrounding area using cameras installed in UAVs and internet of things technologies, and the captured images seem useful for tracking the entire environment. However, innate images from unmanned aerial vehicles show an adaptable visual effect in an uncontrolled environment, making face-mask detection and recognition harder. The UAV picture first had to be converted to grayscale, then its contrast was amplified. Image contrast was improved using Optimum Wavelet-Based Masking and the Enhanced Cuckoo Methodology (ECM). According to the contrast-enhanced image, Gabor-Transform (GT) and Stroke Width Transform (SWT) methods are used to derive attributes that help categorise mask-wearers and non-mask-wearers. Using the retrieved attributes, a Weighted Naive Bayes Classification (WNBC) detected masks in the images. Additionally, a deep neural network-based, the faster Region-Based Convolutional Neural Networks (R-CNN) algorithm combined with Adaptive Galactic Swarm Optimization (AGSO) is being used to identify appropriate and incorrect face mask wear in images, as well as to monitor social distancing among individuals in crowded areas. When the system recognises unmasked individuals, it sends their information to the doctor and the nearby police station. One unmanned aerial vehicle's automated system alert people via speakers, ensuring social spacing. The problem involves a large percentage of appropriate and incorrect face mask wear using data from GitHub and Kaggle, including a training repository of 16,000 images and a testing data set of 12,751 images. To enhance the performance of the model's learning, the methodology of 10-fold cross-validation will be used. Precision, recall, F1-score, and speed are then measured to determine the efficacy of the suggested approach.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedUnmanned Aerial DevicesFaster R-CNNIoTOpenCVUAV

Identifiers

PMID39613761
PMCPMC11607436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.