Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39613750›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Native RNA nanopore sequencing reveals antibiotic-induced loss of rRNA modifications in the A- and P-sites.

Anna Delgado-Tejedor, Rebeca Medina, Oguzhan Begik, Luca Cozzuto, Judith López, Sandra Blanco, Julia Ponomarenko, Eva Maria Novoa

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Compendium of RNA modifications for bacterial stress adaptation.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mechanism of 30S subunit recognition and modification by the conserved bacterial ribosomal RNA methyltransferase RsmI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna Delgado-TejedorCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3836-0293
Rebeca MedinaCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Oguzhan BegikCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8663-4586
Luca CozzutoCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Judith LópezMolecular Mechanisms Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer and Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)-University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3202-9935
Sandra BlancoMolecular Mechanisms Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer and Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)-University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-9392
Julia PonomarenkoCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva Maria NovoaCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain. eva.novoa@crg.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9367-6311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological relevance and dynamics of mRNA modifications have been extensively studied; however, whether rRNA modifications are dynamically regulated, and under which conditions, remains unclear. Here, we systematically characterize bacterial rRNA modifications upon exposure to diverse antibiotics using native RNA nanopore sequencing. To identify significant rRNA modification changes, we develop NanoConsensus, a novel pipeline that is robust across RNA modification types, stoichiometries and coverage, with very low false positive rates, outperforming all individual algorithms tested. We then apply NanoConsensus to characterize the rRNA modification landscape upon antibiotic exposure, finding that rRNA modification profiles are altered in the vicinity of A and P-sites of the ribosome, in an antibiotic-specific manner, possibly contributing to antibiotic resistance. Our work demonstrates that rRNA modification profiles can be rapidly altered in response to environmental exposures, and provides a robust workflow to study rRNA modification dynamics in any species, in a scalable and reproducible manner.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsNanopore SequencingRibosomesRNA, BacterialRNA, RibosomalAlgorithmsEscherichia coliRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalSequence Analysis, RNAAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID39613750
PMCPMC11607429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.