Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39613729›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

γ-Glutamyl transpeptidase-activable nanoprobe crosses the blood-brain barrier for immuno-sonodynamic therapy of glioma.

Bo Li, Gengjia Chen, Huihai Zhong, Tan Li, Minzhao Lin, Huiye Wei, Qiaoyun Zhang, Qi Chen, Jinsheng Huang, Xintao Shuai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bo Li *Nanomedicine Research Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China. libo65@mail2.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5575-3582
Gengjia Chen *Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
Huihai ZhongNanomedicine Research Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Tan LiNanomedicine Research Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Minzhao LinNanomedicine Research Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Huiye WeiNanomedicine Research Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Qiaoyun ZhangNanomedicine Research Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Qi ChenNanomedicine Research Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9694-2355
Jinsheng HuangDepartment of Urology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, China. huangjsh55@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-6371-4532
Xintao ShuaiNanomedicine Research Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China. shuaixt@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4271-0310

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2021M703763China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2024M753755National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 51933011National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 52373164National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82302359Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Guangdong Natural Science Foundation) 2021A1515111006Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Guangdong Natural Science Foundation) 2023A1515011822Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Guangdong Natural Science Foundation) 2024A1515030079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective treatment against glioma remains challenging nowadays because the protective blood-brain barrier (BBB) impedes drug penetration into brain and the limited efficacy of conventional chemotherapy. While strong positively charged nanoparticles have good permeability through the BBB, they often come with the caveat of cationic toxicity to healthy tissues and organs during blood circulation. Here we show a neutrally charged nanoprobe with a surface decorated with γ-glutamyl moieties that can be cleaved by γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, an enzyme overexpressed on brain capillaries. Upon the cleavage, positively charged primary amines are generated, facilitating the effective crossing of the nanoprobe through BBB via the adsorption-mediated transcytosis pathway, while avoiding the caveat of cationic toxicity. In addition, when reaching the acidic tumor microenvironment, the nanoprobe co-encapsulating sonosensitizer and immune agonist swells, which results in an accelerated drug release under ultrasound irradiation to induce a combined immune response, ultimately leading to a robust anticancer effect. Overall, we report an effective drug delivery nanoplatform across the BBB for an enhanced therapy of glioma.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierBrain Neoplasmsgamma-GlutamyltransferaseGliomaNanoparticlesAnimalsCell Line, TumorDrug Delivery SystemsDrug LiberationHumansImmunotherapyMiceMice, NudeTumor MicroenvironmentUltrasonic Therapygamma-Glutamyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID39613729
PMCPMC11607351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.