ReviewTranslational oncology2025
FLASH radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: From biological mechanisms to blockbuster therapeutics.
Review in Translational oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gold Nanoparticle-Mediated DNA Damage Under FLASH Electron-Beam Irradiation: A Monte Carlo Study.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Revisiting the Abscopal Effect in the Era of Immuno-Radiotherapy: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Clinical Perspectives.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Harnessing the sparing effect of FLASH-RT: From phenomenon observation, radiophysical determinants to molecular mechanisms and synergistic strategies.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Towards FLASH Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer: A Review on Preclinical Evidence and Technical Feasibility.Cancers · 2026Review
- Timing matters: how mechanism-guided sequencing shapes the efficacy of radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations : A systematic review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Advances in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced brain necrosis: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Tumor-associated macrophages: potential therapeutic strategies and future prospects in radioresistance of cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- FLASH Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer: Translational Mechanisms, Preclinical Evidence, and Barriers.Cureus · 2026Review
- FLASH radiotherapy and immunotherapy synergy: mechanisms, strategies, and clinical translation prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Harnessing the immune system: future directions in cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Factors Influencing the Biological Effects of FLASH Irradiation.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploring the Metabolic Impact of FLASH Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2025Review
- Influence factor and mechanism of FLASH effect.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- FLASH-RT for pulmonary protection: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, technological advances, and clinical translation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Phenomenological insights into the FLASH radiotherapy-induced abscopal effect.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Radiotherapy FLASH-RT: From Treating Lung Cancer to Preventing Pulmonary Fibrosis.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
FLASH ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (RT) can effectively exert the protective effect on normal tissue and reduce the risk of treatment-related toxicity, without compromising the killing effect on tumor tissue, resulting in a significant differential biological effect between tumor control and normal tissue damage, namely the FLASH effect. To date, the precise biological details of the FLASH effect remain uncertain. The currently mainstream mechanisms proposed by the academic community include the transient oxygen depletion hypothesis, free radical hypothesis, immune protection hypothesis, and DNA integrity hypothesis, which have attracted increasing attention in recent years. Based on these theoretical principles and numerous investigations on the FLASH effect in vivo and in vitro, the combined application of FLASH and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been considered synergistic and potentially practical. The primary underlying basis is that FLASH might actively preserve the number and function of circulating immune cells, thereby enhancing the efficacy of immune cell-mediated immunotherapy. Meanwhile, FLASH RT could activate the tumor immune microenvironment and transform "cold'' tumors into ''hot'' ones, consequently boosting local and systemic anti-tumor immunity and expanding the therapeutic benefits of ICIs. Moreover, FLASH might attenuate immunoinflammatory responses and minimize the incidence of radiation-related adverse events, allowing for the potentially safer and promising clinical application of combing FLASH RT with ICI therapy. Nevertheless, data on this treatment modality is currently lacking, and several barriers remain to be addressed, including the logistical bottlenecks, technical hurdles, limited availability, and unclear biological mechanisms. Further research is warranted in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.