Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39612654›Full record

Trial reportEBioMedicine2024

Circadian clock disruption impairs immune oscillation in chronic endogenous hypercortisolism: a multi-level analysis from a multicentre clinical trial.

Valeria Hasenmajer, Emilia Sbardella, Francesca Sciarra, Chiara Simeoli, Claudia Pivonello, Filippo Ceccato, Riccardo Pofi, Marianna Minnetti, Flavio Rizzo, Davide Ferrari and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Lowering the dexamethasone suppression test cut-off: is it time yet?Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Valeria HasenmajerDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Emilia SbardellaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Francesca SciarraDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Chiara SimeoliDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Sezione di Endocrinologia, Diabetologia, Andrologia e Nutrizione, Università Federico II di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Claudia PivonelloDipartimento di Sanità Pubblica, Università Federico II di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Filippo CeccatoEndocrinology, Dep of Medicine, DIMED, University-Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy; Endocrine Disease Unit, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Riccardo PofiOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Marianna MinnettiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Flavio RizzoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Davide FerrariDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Ilaria BonaventuraDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Federica BarbagalloDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Kore University of Enna, 94100, Enna, Italy.
Elisa GiannettaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Danilo Alunni FegatelliDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Disease, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Simone ConiaSapienza NLP, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Roberto NavigliSapienza NLP, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giorgio ArnaldiDepartement of Promozione della Salute, Materno-Infantile, Medicina Interna e Specialistica di Eccellenza "G. D'Alessandro" (PROMISE), Palermo University, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Carla ScaroniEndocrinology, Dep of Medicine, DIMED, University-Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy; Endocrine Disease Unit, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Rosario PivonelloDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Sezione di Endocrinologia, Diabetologia, Andrologia e Nutrizione, Università Federico II di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Daniele GianfrilliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Mary Anna VenneriDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Andrea M IsidoriDepartment of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy; Centre for Rare Diseases (Endo-ERN Accredited), Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: andrea.isidori@uniroma1.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlucocorticoids (GC) are potent entrainers of the circadian clock. However, their effects on biological rhythms in chronic human exposure have yet to be studied. Endogenous hypercortisolism (Cushing's Syndrome, CS) is a rare condition in which circadian disruption is sustained by a tumorous source of GC excess, offering the unique opportunity to investigate GC's chronic effects in vivo.

methodsIn a 12-month prospective case-control multicentre trial, the daily fluctuations in the number of circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and the time-specific expression of clock-related genes were analysed in a cohort of 68 subjects, 34 affected by CS and 34 matched controls. Cosinor mixed effects model, rhythmicity algorithms and machine learning techniques were applied to the multi-level dataset.

findingsMultiple, 5-point daily sampling revealed profound changes in the levels, amplitude, and rhythmicity of several PBMC populations during active CS, only partially restored after remission. Clock gene analyses in isolated PBMCs showed a significant flattening of circadian oscillation of CLOCK, PER1, PER2, PER3, and TIMELESS expression. In active CS, all methods confirmed a loss of rhythmicity of those genes which were circadian in the PBMCs of controls. Most, but not all, genes regained physiological oscillation after remission. Machine learning revealed that while combined time-course sets of clock genes were highly effective in separating patients from controls, immune profiling was efficient even as single time points.

interpretationIn conclusion, the oscillation of circulating immune cells is profoundly altered in patients with CS, representing a convergence point of circadian rhythm disruption and metabolic and steroid hormone imbalances. Machine learning techniques proved the superiority of immune profiling over parameters such as cortisol, anthropometric and metabolic variables, and circadian gene expression analysis to identify CS activity.

fundingThe research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union in the context of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan, Investment PE8 - Project Age-It: "Ageing Well in an Ageing Society". This resource was co-financed by the Next Generation EU [DM 1557 11.10.2022], the PRecisiOn Medicine to Target Frailty of Endocrine-metabolic Origin (PROMETEO) project (NET-2018-12365454) by the Italian Ministry of Health, and through internal funding to Sapienza University of Rome.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksCushing SyndromeLeukocytes, MononuclearAdultCase-Control StudiesCircadian RhythmFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesCircadian rhythmCushing's syndromeGlucocorticoidsHypercortisolismImmune system

Identifiers

PMID39612654
PMCPMC11647478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.