Observational studyEBioMedicine2024
An automated blood test for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) to predict the absence of intracranial lesions on head CT in adult patients with mild traumatic brain injury: BRAINI, a multicentre observational study in Europe.
Observational study in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04032509 (A Prospective Clinical Study of Biomarkers of Mild Traumatic BRAIN Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Clinical Study of Biomarkers of Mild Traumatic BRAIN Injury
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood-based biomarkers GFAP/UCH-L1 for the diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): a single-center implementation experience.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- GFAP and UCH-L1 for Ruling out Intracranial Lesions After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Observational
- Article
- Ceramide-rich extracellular vesicles as pathogenic biomarkers in traumatic brain injury.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Correlation of Routine Admission Inflammatory Biomarkers with Individual Traumatic Brain Lesion Types in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Biomarkers and clinical rules for the management of mild traumatic brain injury: a narrative review.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Exosome-Based Diagnostics and Cell-Free Therapeutics for Traumatic Brain Injury: From Mechanisms to Bedside.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Cytokines and related signaling pathways in traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The Role of Interleukins in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Synthesis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Plasma levels of biomarkers associated with vasodilation and neuroinflammation in pediatric patients with head trauma and their relationship with clinical characteristics of patients.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Analytical and clinical evaluations of Snibe MaglumiClinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Budget Impact Analysis of the Use of Specific Biomarkers GFAP and UCH-L1 in the Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Spain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Proteasomes and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase L1 as Biomarkers of Tissue Damage and Inflammatory Response to Different Types of Injury-A Short Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Consensus on the management of traumatic brain injury in older adults: Results from a Delphi study.Brain & spine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), elevated concentrations of brain-specific blood proteins glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) may be indicative of intracranial lesions normally detected by head CT scans. We sought to validate the performance of this combination of biomarkers at predetermined cutoff values with an automated immunoassay to predict which patients did not have intracranial lesions.
methodsThis prospective, observational study was conducted in France and Spain at 16 emergency departments. Adult patients with mTBI were eligible if they had a head CT scan and gave a 10-ml blood sample within 12 h of injury. GFAP and UCH-L1 serum concentrations were measured and analysed, in less than an hour time, according to predefined cutoff values of 22 pg/ml and 327 pg/ml, respectively. Serum concentrations of S100B protein were concomitantly determined in a subset of patients. The primary outcome measures were the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the combined GFAP-UCH-L1 test to rule out intracranial lesions on head CT scans. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT04032509).
findingsBetween August 2019 and June 2021, 1508 patients were recruited, and 1438 were included in the main analysis. Median age was 69 years (IQR 44-83). Most patients (74%) presented 3 h after trauma. 179 (12.4%) patients were positive for intracranial lesions by CT. The sensitivity of the combined test was 98.3% (95% CI 95.0-99.7) and the specificity 24.9 (95% CI 22.6-27.4), with a NPV of 99.1% (95% CI 97.1-99.8). Three patients with a positive CT scan had negative biomarker test results. S100B had a sensitivity of 83.0% (95% CI 76.2-88.2) and a NPV of 94.2% (95% CI 91.6-96.0). Patients with higher biomarker values more frequently had poorer recovery at 3 months after injury.
interpretationTesting for GFAP and UCH-L1, using validated cutoffs obtained with a new, fast automated immunoassay platform, accurately predicted the absence of intracranial lesions on head CT following mTBI.
fundingThis study is co-funded by the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) Health, a body of the European Union (Grant nº19474). Biomarkers tests were funded by bioMérieux.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.