Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39612510›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024

Analyzing Patient Experience on Weibo: Machine Learning Approach to Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.

Xiao Chen, Zhiyun Shen, Tingyu Guan, Yuchen Tao, Yichen Kang, Yuxia Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiao Chen *Department of Nursing, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Room 501, No 180 Fenglin road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China, 86 13816881925, 86 64041990.ORCID 0000-0002-9476-812X
Zhiyun Shen *Department of Nursing, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Room 501, No 180 Fenglin road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China, 86 13816881925, 86 64041990.ORCID 0009-0001-8646-8696
Tingyu GuanDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Room 501, No 180 Fenglin road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China, 86 13816881925, 86 64041990.ORCID 0009-0001-7629-2076
Yuchen TaoDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Room 501, No 180 Fenglin road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China, 86 13816881925, 86 64041990.ORCID 0009-0007-3517-4317
Yichen KangDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Room 501, No 180 Fenglin road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China, 86 13816881925, 86 64041990.ORCID 0009-0003-2216-3820
Yuxia Zhang *Department of Nursing, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Room 501, No 180 Fenglin road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China, 86 13816881925, 86 64041990.ORCID 0000-0003-4419-7004

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social media platforms allow individuals to openly gather, communicate, and share information about their interactions with health care services, becoming an essential supplemental means of understanding patient experience. Objective: We aimed to identify common discussion topics related to health care experience from the public's perspective and to determine areas of concern from patients' perspectives that health care providers should act on. Methods: This study conducted a spatiotemporal analysis of the volume, sentiment, and topic of patient experience-related posts on the Weibo platform developed by Sina Corporation. We applied a supervised machine learning approach including human annotation and machine learning-based models for topic modeling and sentiment analysis of the public discourse. A multiclassifier voting method based on logistic regression, multinomial naïve Bayes, and random forest was used. Results: A total of 4008 posts were manually classified into patient experience topics. A patient experience theme framework was developed. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure of the method integrating logistic regression, multinomial naïve Bayes, and random forest for patient experience themes were 0.93, 0.95, 0.80, 0.77, and 0.84, respectively, indicating a satisfactory prediction. The sentiment analysis revealed that negative sentiment posts constituted the highest proportion (3319/4008, 82.81%). Twenty patient experience themes were discussed on the social media platform. The majority of the posts described the interpersonal aspects of care (2947/4008, 73.53%); the five most frequently discussed topics were "health care professionals' attitude," "access to care," "communication, information, and education," "technical competence," and "efficacy of treatment." Conclusions: Hospital administrators and clinicians should consider the value of social media and pay attention to what patients and their family members are communicating on social media. To increase the utility of these data, a machine learning algorithm can be used for topic modeling. The results of this study highlighted the interpersonal and functional aspects of care, especially the interpersonal aspects, which are often the "moment of truth" during a service encounter in which patients make a critical evaluation of hospital services.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSocial MediaBayes TheoremHumansPatient Satisfactionattitudeexperiencefree-textmachine learningnatural language processNLPopinionpatient experienceperceptionperspectivesentimentsocial mediaspatiotemporaltopic modelingunstructuredWeibo

Identifiers

PMID39612510
PMCPMC11623958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.