ReviewThe Journal of physiology2025
Ultrastructure and cardiac impulse propagation: scaling up from microscopic to macroscopic conduction.
Review in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac Impulse Propagation: An Integrated View.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2026Review
- Injectable, Conductive, Multifunctional Hydrogels with Sustained Luteolin Release for Promoting Myocardial Infarction Repair.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Ephaptic coupling and the source-sink effect of cardiac conduction.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Gap junctional and ephaptic coupling in cardiac electrical propagation: homocellular and heterocellular perspectives.The Journal of physiology · 2026Review
- Exercise-induced dysregulation of the adrenergic response in a mouse model of PKP2-arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.Heart rhythm · 2025Article
- Electrodiffusion dynamics in the cardiomyocyte dyad at nano-scale resolution using the Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) equations.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Post-extrasystolic variation of ST segment and T wave as a mortality risk predictor after myocardial infarction.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The standard conception of cardiac conduction is based on the cable theory of nerve conduction, which treats cardiac tissue as a continuous syncytium described by the Hodgkin-Huxley equations. However, cardiac tissue is composed of discretized cells with microscopic and macroscopic heterogeneities and discontinuities, such as subcellular localizations of sodium channels and connexins. In addition to this, there are heterogeneities in the distribution of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves, which powerfully regulate impulse propagation. In the continuous models, the ultrastructural details, i.e. the microscopic heterogeneities and discontinuities, are ignored by 'coarse graining' or 'smoothing'. However, these ultrastructural components may play crucial roles in cardiac conduction and arrhythmogenesis, particularly in disease states. We discuss the current progress of modelling the effects of ultrastructural components on electrical conduction, the issues and challenges faced by the cardiac modelling community, and how to scale up conduction properties at the subcellular (microscopic) scale to the tissue and whole-heart (macroscopic) scale in future modelling and experimental studies, i.e. how to link the ultrastructure at different scales to impulse conduction and arrhythmogenesis in the heart.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.