Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39612368›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

The conversion of electroanatomic maps for compatibility with treatment planning systems in cardiac radioablation target volume definition.

Sarah L Konermann, Ian J Gerard, Martin L Bernier, Tarek Hijal, Gabriela Stroian, Neil Kopek, Joanne Alfieri, Lynn El-Hamedi, Piotr Pater

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah L KonermannMedical Physics Unit, Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ian J GerardDivision of Radiation Oncology, Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Martin L BernierDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Tarek HijalDivision of Radiation Oncology, Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Gabriela StroianMedical Physics Unit, Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Neil KopekDivision of Radiation Oncology, Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Joanne AlfieriDivision of Radiation Oncology, Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Lynn El-HamediBiosense-Webster, Johnson & Johnson, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Piotr PaterMedical Physics Unit, Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (RI-MUHC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac radioablation (CRA) is a new and promising treatment modality for patients with ventricular tachycardia refractory to standard-of-care treatment. Electroanatomic maps are used to define radiation target volumes; however, there is currently no native method to import electroanatomic maps into the treatment planning system (TPS). PURPOSE: To develop Edico, a semi-automated tool to enable electroanatomic map import into a TPS, by converting electroanatomic maps to a Digital Imaging and COmmunications in Medicine (DICOM) standard. The overall aim is to facilitate target volume delineation and improve workflow efficiency in treating patients.

methodsEdico imports voltage and spatial data from electroanatomic maps and sorts these into voxels to be exported in a DICOM format, with each voxel containing the average voltage value of the data that falls within it. Three different rectangular electroanatomic maps were created and processed using Edico to ensure that expected features are maintained through processing. A sensitivity analysis of voxel size was completed using 19 different electroanatomic maps processed at five different sets of voxel dimensions, for a total of 95 resulting voxelized datasets. The coefficient of variation in each populated voxel in the datasets was analyzed to determine which voxel sizes are necessary to ensure that data loss is kept to a minimum throughout processing, despite averaging. Five electroanatomic maps were used to re-contour clinical target volumes and planning target volumes for previously-treated patients with their electroanatomic maps now directly registered to their planning computed tomography (CT) scans.

resultsAll three rectangular test electroanatomic maps were processed as expected. All tested voxel sizes resulted in low coefficients of variation overall, with the exception of the largest voxel size of 1.8 × 1.8 × 8 mm. When using Edico, a user should choose voxel dimensions similar to or smaller than those of a planning CT. Of five pairs of clinical and planning target volumes from previously treated patients, adjustments were made to four (80%), retrospectively, using the electroanatomic maps generated using Edico, registered to the patients' planning CTs.

conclusionsEdico provides a reliable solution for electroanatomic map import into a TPS and facilitates clinical and planning target volume identification in CRA.

Indexed as

HeartRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumanscardiac radioablationelectroanatomic mapsventricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID39612368
PMCPMC11788238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.