Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39612258›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2024

Marginal health care expenditures for melanoma care in the United States.

Olajumoke A Olateju, Jieni Li, J Douglas Thornton, Rajender R Aparasu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olajumoke A OlatejuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
Jieni LiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
J Douglas ThorntonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
Rajender R AparasuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of melanoma has increased significantly in the past few decades, posing a significant public health challenge. However, there is an evidence gap regarding the marginal costs of treating melanoma.

objectiveTo examine the marginal health care expenditures for melanoma compared with other nonskin cancers among US adults.

methodsThis study examined individuals aged 18 years or older with melanoma, nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), and other cancers from the 2011-2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey datasets. Direct health care expenditures involving hospital inpatient, outpatient, prescription medications, dental, vision, home health care, and other medical services for melanoma were analyzed using generalized linear models, and comparisons were made with expenditures for other types of cancers while adjusting for other patient characteristics.

resultsThere were 0.70 million individuals (95% CI = 0.61-0.78) diagnosed with melanoma annually. Total health care expenditures among individuals with melanoma, NMSC, and other cancers were $19,427, $13,744, and $23,741, respectively. A generally increasing trend of expenditure was observed over the years. Notably, office-based care (30.46%), inpatient services (28.78%), and prescription (18.27%) costs primarily accounted for the health care burden of patients with melanoma. Adjusted marginal total health care expenditures for melanoma were found to be lower ($-3,369.01 [95% CI = -$5,934.15 to -$803.85]) than other cancers but higher ($2,844.75 [95% CI = $2,204.77-$3,484.72]) compared with NMSC. Prescription expenditures were similar across the 3 cancer study groups.

conclusionsThis study found that adjusted marginal expenditures for melanoma were higher than those with NMSC but lower than other nonskin cancers, with office-based care and inpatient expenditures contributing to most of the expenditures. The findings suggest that concerted efforts are needed to control the primary cost drivers to reduce the associated burden of potentially preventable skin cancer like melanoma.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39612258
PMCPMC11607212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.