ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Integrated analysis of disulfidptosis-related genes SLC7A11, SLC3A2, RPN1 and NCKAP1 across cancers.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic significance of genes associated with disulfidptosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- RPN1 at the crossroads of glycosylation, tumor immunity, and disulfidptosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Disulfidptosis in cancer: from redox stress to therapeutic strategy.Cancer gene therapy · 2026Review
- Disulfidptosis: A Metabolic Cell Death Mechanism with Therapeutic Potential in Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Molecular subtypes and prognostic signature rooted in disulfidptosis highlight tumor microenvironment in lung adenocarcinoma.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disulfidptosis, a newly identified form of regulated cell death associated with disruption of disulfide bond formation in the endoplasmic reticulum, involves the dysregulation of disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) that may contribute to cancer development and progression. However, the molecular mechanisms and clinical implications of DRGs in different cancer types remain poorly characterized. Therefore, in this comprehensive study, we investigated the expression, prognostic value, and functional roles of four recently identified DRGs (SLC7A11, SLC3A2, RPN1, and NCKAP1) across various cancers. Especially, in clinical samples of glioblastoma, we found that RPN1 was significantly correlated with patient survival. Through mutation landscape analysis, we identified diverse missense mutations in these DRGs, with NCKAP1 exhibiting the highest mutation frequency (5.9% in skin cutaneous melanoma). Additionally, we observed positive correlations between these DRGs and tumor stemness (DNAss DNA stemness score and RNAss RNA stemness score) as well as RNA modifications, particularly m6A modification, in several cancer types. Furthermore, high expression of SLC7A11, RPN1, and NCKAP1 was positively associated with infiltration of T-helper type 2 (Th2) cells in various cancers, while high expression of SLC7A11, SLC3A2, and RPN1 correlated with tumor mutational burden (TMB) in 10, 4, and 8 tumor types, respectively. Utilizing a protein-protein interaction network, we identified the RHO GTPases Activate WASPs and WAVEs pathway as significantly enriched, suggesting the involvement of these DRGs in cancer-related signaling pathways. Collectively, our findings provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms and clinical implications of DRGs in pan-cancer, highlighting their potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.