Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39612087›Full record

ArticleAmbio2025

Part of or apart from nature? Characteristics, environmental attitudes, and priorities of the nature (dis)connected.

Sonia L Curll, Samantha K Stanley, Patricia M Brown, Léan V O'Brien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonia L CurllDiscipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari Street, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia. sonia.curll@canberra.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9653-9286
Samantha K StanleyUNSW Institute for Climate Risk & Response, University of New South Wales, Mathews Building, UNSW Kensington Campus, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Patricia M BrownDiscipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari Street, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.
Léan V O'BrienDiscipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari Street, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The separation between people and nature is a key driver of environmental decline. Despite increased interest in nature connectedness, we know little about nature disconnection or the degree of connectedness required for pro-environmental choices. Using a large probability sample of Australians (N = 1101), we explore differences in the characteristics, attitudes, and priorities among those with low, moderate, and high nature connectedness levels. Compared to those more connected, individuals with low connectedness were younger, more urban, and less educated. They spent less time in nature, enjoyed nature less, were less impacted by environmental problems, and rated climate change as less severe, suggesting insulation or detachment from the natural environment. Even a moderate level of connectedness was linked to a significant uplift in pro-environmental attitudes, behaviours, and priorities (e.g. environmental vs. economic issues). Our work contributes towards a comprehensive understanding of nature (dis)connection, with practical implications for interventions targeting a more sustainable future.

Indexed as

AttitudeConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmentNatureAdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaClimate ChangeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultClimate changeInclusion with natureNature connectednessNature disconnectionPro-environmental attitudesPro-environmental behaviours

Identifiers

PMID39612087
PMCPMC11780049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.