ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2025
Restructuring the role of emergency departments in the healthcare systems: a vector to improving physician resilience.
Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of hospital restructuring on emergency department quality: a natural experiment.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Managing Resilience and Exhaustion Among Health Care Workers Through Psychological Self-Care: The Impact of Job Autonomy in Interaction With Role Overload.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Article
- What's new in critical illness and injury science? Emergency, critical, and operative care - A contemporary concept in junctional care and research, featuring the integration of operations, care, and compassion for seamless acute care delivery.International journal of critical illness and injury scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare systems are continuously evolving to respond to new geodemographic demands, among other challenges. At the forefront of this exercise of malleability, Emergency Departments (EDs) are often put to test as the default access point, while the rest of the system takes time to adapt. Once highly adaptable, years of cumulative strain have stressed the limits of the current organization of Emergency Departments (ED) within the healthcare system worldwide. The consequences are many, most notably for Emergency Physicians (EPs), who now face the highest rate of burnout among all medical specialties, with career resilience at an all-time low and diminished interest in the profession. Understanding how EDs are structured within their respective healthcare system provides a unique lens through which areas of improvement can be assessed. This paper discusses solutions to improve the overall structure of the healthcare system to help improve responsiveness, reduce relegation of tasks to the ED, and help improve working conditions and wellbeing for EPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39612059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.