ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
Altered cervical proprioception and biomechanics in obstructive sleep apnea: a case-control study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of strenghtning oropharyngeal myofunctional therapy combined with cervical spine exercises in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Trial
- Subaxial Cervical Sagittal Alignment as an Anatomical Correlate of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity: A Cephalometric Analysis.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to compare cervical proprioception and related biomechanical factors among patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and asymptomatic controls.
methodsIn this case-control study, polysomnography scores (apnea-hypopnea index-AHI) were examined to determine the disease severity of the OSA group. Also, we evaluated cervical proprioception by using a laser pointer to detect joint repositioning error sense in cervical rotational movements. Comparison statistics were also conducted for the cervical musculoskeletal variables such as range of motion (ROM) with bubble inclinometer, cranio-cervical (CVA), and thoracic posture (TKA) through photometric analysis, neck flexor muscle endurance test, and pain pressure thresholds of trapezius (PPT).
resultsThis case-control study included 59 male participants: patients with OSA (n = 29; mean age = 49.10 years; mean BMI = 28.41 kg/m2) and asymptomatic controls (n = 30; mean age = 49.73 years; mean BMI = 26.89 ± 3.60 kg/m2). The mean AHI score was 26.06 events/hour, categorizing the severity of OSA as mild (31.03%), moderate (31.03%), and severe (37.94%). Patients with OSA demonstrated significantly poorer cervical proprioception compared to controls for both sides of cervical rotation with larger effect sizes (d:1.36-1.45; p < 0.05). Also, cervical ROM, CVA, TKA, neck flexor muscle endurance test, and PPT values were altered in the OSA group compared to the control group (p < 0.05).
conclusionImpaired cervical proprioception may be a previously unrecognized factor associated with OSA. This finding has implications for understanding the mechanisms underlying cervical musculoskeletal changes in OSA and for developing potential new interventions or exercise designs targeting postural control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39612037What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.