Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024
Quality of care of oncological patients with home parenteral nutrition.
Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03425435 (Quality of Care of Oncological Patients With Home Parenteral Nutrition), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Quality of Care of Oncological Patients With Home Parenteral Nutrition
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTransferring adult cancer patients from the hospital to the home environment for home parenteral nutrition (HPN) can be challenging. There is limited real-world data on how those affected perceive this situation. Our aim was to assess the quality of life (QoL) on HPN and the benefits and burdens from the cancer patient's perspective.
methodsThis observational study from Germany examined the QoL on HPN on the basis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - G questionnaire (FACT-G). The benefits and burdens of HPN were assessed using predefined questions and answers tailored to the situation of this patient group.
results139 adults with advanced solid tumors in a palliative setting at 10 hospitals in Germany were eligible for the study. The follow-up was 12 weeks. At week 4, the Least-square (LS) mean (95% CI) change from baseline in the total FACT-G score was 0.9 (-2.4; 4.2) points, indicating QoL stability. HPN was associated with few complications, with a low rate of hospital readmission due to catheter-related issues (3.8%; n = 5). In the patient assessment of the benefits of HPN, the LS mean values at Week 4 ranged between 7.6 and 8.5 on a 10-point Likert scale. The most commonly perceived burden was "restricted mobility".
conclusionWith thorough preparation for home parenteral nutrition, the transition from hospital to home care environment works well. QoL is largely maintained through HPN, and cancer patients perceive this situation as not or minimally burdensome alongside their underlying disease, although many patients found the limited mobility to be a burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03425435 / Date of registration: February 01, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.