ReviewJournal of molecular histology2024
Endometrioid tubal intraepithelial neoplasia (E-TIN): case report & literature review.
Review in Journal of molecular histology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tubal epithelial alterations: evolving concepts.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An endometrioid carcinogenic pathway of the fallopian tube with possible potential precursors including type II SCOUTs (secretory cell outgrowths) and E-TIN (endometrioid tubal intraepithelial neoplasia) has been recently documented. We report an incidental focus of E-TIN identified in a hysterectomy specimen for Grade 1 endometrioid type endometrial carcinoma. The lesion was present at the fimbriated end of left fallopian tube involving 1 plica. It comprised crowded glandular proliferation with a pseudostratified columnar lining. The cells displayed elongated nuclei with no remarkable nuclear atypia.Immunohistochemistry showed patchy loss of PAX 2 expression with multifocal aberrant nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for B-catenin. p53 was wild-type and ER was positive.In view of the co-existing endometrioid type endometrial carcinoma, a possible metastatic spread to the fallopian tube was considered. However, morphologically no obvious nuclear atypia noted, and no associated inflammatory response or desmoplastic stromal reaction identified within the tubal lesion. And on immunostaining, the endometrial tumour was distinct from the tubal lesion. For instance, PTEN was negative/lost in the endometrial tumour but retained in the tubal lesion and B-catenin was membranous in the endometrial tumour but aberrant with multifocal nuclear and cytoplasmic overexpression in the tubal lesion. WT1 was negative in the endometrial tumour but positively expressed by the tubal lesion. All the above findings favoured the possibility of the tubal lesion as being independent of the endometrial primary. In conclusion, we describe an incidental B-catenin aberrant endometrioid type proliferation of the fallopian tube/E-TIN, to raise awareness of such lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39612010What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.