ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024
Mesh-related complications and recurrence after incisional hernia repair in patients with fistulizing versus non-fistulizing Crohn's disease.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Innovative Strategies in Hernia Mesh Design: Materials, Mechanics, and Modeling.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatients with Crohn's disease (CD) frequently undergo multiple abdominal operations, which increase the risk of incisional hernia repair (IHR) and associated mesh-related complications. Patients with intra-abdominal fistulizing CD (FCD) may be more susceptible to mesh-related complications than patients with non-fistulizing CD (non-FCD). The primary objective was to evaluate the risk of reoperation due to mesh-related complications after IHR in patients with FCD and non-FCD. Secondarily, the study evaluated the impact of isolated perianal fistulizing CD on mesh-related complications and the difference in hernia recurrence reoperation rates between FCD and non-FCD patients.
methodsThis nationwide study followed patients from 30 days after their first recorded IHR until reoperation due to mesh-related complications or hernia recurrence. Cumulative incidence proportion and Cox regression analysis were used to estimate the risk of these outcomes.
resultsA total of 334 patients with CD (FCD, n = 55; non-FCD, n = 279) underwent IHR between 2007 and 2016 with a follow-up rate of 100%. FCD patients had a significantly higher 5 year risk of reoperation for mesh-related complications (HR 15.95, 95% CI 4.29-59.35) compared with non-FCD patients. None of the patients with isolated perianal fistulizing disease required a reoperation for mesh-related complications. The overall risk of reoperation for recurrence was 8.7%, and did not vary significantly between FCD and non-FCD patients (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.44-2.58).
conclusionsFCD may be associated with higher rates of mesh-related complications compared with non-FCD, although larger studies are needed to confirm this finding. Conversely, isolated perianal fistulas do not appear to be associated with an increased risk of mesh-related complications. The benefits associated with mesh should be balanced with the risk of long-term mesh-related complications in patients with FCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39611992What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.