ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Independent certification of a suite of qNMR internal standards: ensuring metrological traceability in a wide range of applications.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Brazilian National Metrology Institute produced a suite of certified reference materials (CRMs) intended as internal standards (ISs) for quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR). Being a ratio primary method, the use of qNMR in organic chemistry has already crossed the borders of research laboratories, despite the cost of instrumentation. The International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) proposed eight potential qNMR ISs. Four candidate materials were selected for their solubility in various solvents and distinct chemical shifts, making them suitable for qNMR analysis of diverse analytes. The certification process compared orthogonal primary methods such as mass balance, qNMR, freezing-point depression, and coulometry, to ensure independent value assignment. Different approaches were compared to assess batch homogeneity and stability. While directly comparing the main compound's chromatographic area proved to be a quick and fit-for-purpose approach, the determination of individual impurities provided lower uncertainties but required more laborious work. CRM batches of maleic acid, dimethyl sulfone, potassium hydrogen phthalate, and dimethyl terephthalate were delivered with over 999.8 mg g
Indexed as
Identifiers
39611990What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.