ArticleArchives of dermatological research2024
Adapting pediatric dermatology textbooks in South America: enhancing visual representation for skin of color patients.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin diseases have different visual characteristics in skin of color, making recognition a challenge. Pictures and illustrations of darker skin tones in the literature are scarce. In American pediatric dermatology books, less than 40% of photographs depict skin of color. No similar studies have been conducted for South American pediatric dermatology books. This study evaluates the frequency of photographs of skin of color in pediatric dermatology textbooks and atlases. A prospective documentary study was conducted on the skin color of clinical photographs from 5 pediatric dermatology books (4 Brazilian, 1 Argentinian). All photographs were evaluated by three researchers and classified using the Massey-Martin scale (white 1-2, light brown 3-5, dark brown 6-8, black 9-10). Out of 3,471 photographs, 1,000 were excluded, and skin color was determined in 2,471 photographs. White was identified in 1,403 (56%), light brown in 1,044 (42%), dark brown in 24 (1%), and 0 (0%) in black. Atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, and psoriasis were the most common diagnoses; however, no dark brown or black skin was represented. In conclusion, photographs of skin of color were less frequent, despite most of the Brazilian population (55.5%) identifying as Black, and in Argentina, 0.7%, though hindered by the lack of self-identification questions before the 2022 census. This disparity undermines education, highlighting the need to increase representation of skin of color in educational materials to improve healthcare for these populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39611986What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.