ArticleWorld journal of urology2024
Surgical experience overcomes the impact of prostatic-urethral anatomy on continence recovery after robotic prostatectomy: comprehensive analysis on 366 cases.
Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-session pelvic prehabilitation improves continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Six-month outcomes of a three-arm prospective study comparing Da Vinci vs. Hugo RAS vs. versius robotic radical prostatectomy: (the COMPAR-P trial).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Preoperative MRI-based predictive model for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the relationship between a set of prostate-urethral complex (PUC) measurements and incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
methodsThe study included data from patients undergoing RARP performed by 2 expert surgeons between 2019 and 2022, with data about preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional follow-up. Continence status was assessed according to a stringent definition (no PADS used). MRIs were evaluated to calculate prostatic urethral length, membranous urethral length, membranous urethral width, levator ani thickness, and prostate shape. The association of PUC measurements with continence after RARP was studied. Secondarily, we evaluated whether pre-determined cut-off values of PUC measurements could be associated with time to continence. Cumulative hazard incidence analysis was performed by the Nelson-Aalen hazard function. Cumulative incidence hazard curves were built; the Peto-Peto test was used to evaluate the difference among the curves.
results366 patients were included. At the 12-month follow-up, 333 patients (90.1%) were continent. Classification of PUC measurements overlapped between continent and noncontinent patients. However, a statistically significant difference was observed for levator ani thickness, greater in continent patients (12.8 mm vs. 11.7; p = 0.02). Multivariable models found BMI as independent predictor of incontinence (HR 1.04, 95% C.I 1.00-1.07, p = 0.04). None of PUC measurements associated with incontinence. Also, cumulative hazard incidence analysis at 3 / 6 / 12-months found no statistically significant difference in PUC measurements.
conclusionNo association was found between anatomical characteristics of PUC and continence or time to continence after RARP performed by proficient surgeons. Our data would suggest that once the surgeon has surpassed the learning curve, anatomical variations do not significantly affect the appropriate and proficient execution of the prostate apex dissection during RARP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39611980What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.