Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39611979›Full record

ReviewPlanta2024

Broomrape-host interaction: host morphology and physiology as metrics for infestation.

Amnon Cochavi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amnon CochaviNewe Ya'ar Research Center, Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization - Volcani Institute, 3009500, Ramat Yishay, Israel. amnonc@volcani.agri.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0238-711X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionIn contrast to other plant pests, broomrape, parasitic plant, rely on maintaining the productivity of the host plant to complete their life cycle. Parasitic plants, particularly those in the Orobanchaceae family, rely on their host plants to complete their life cycle. Unlike other plant parasites such as fungi and bacteria, which exploit their hosts regardless of their physiological status, parasitic plants development is linked to the host productivity due to their mutual physiological dependence on water availability and sugar metabolism. Presently, most research focuses on the damage caused to the host after the parasite completes its life cycle, including inflorescence emergence and seed dispersal. However, the interaction between parasite and host begins long before these stages. This implies that certain physiological adaptations are necessary to sustain the parasite's development while maintaining the host's productivity. In this review, I compile existing knowledge regarding changes in host physiology during the early developmental stages of parasitic plants, spanning from attachment to inflorescence emergence. Additionally, I highlight knowledge gaps that should be addressed to understand how hosts sustain themselves throughout extended periods of parasitism.

Indexed as

Host-Parasite InteractionsOrobanchaceaePlant DiseasesCombined stressHydraulic adjustmentPhotoprotectionPhysiological adaption

Identifiers

PMID39611979
PMCPMC11607093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.