Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39611962›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2025

The relationship of changes in insulin demand and insulin adequacy over the life course.

Yingchai Zhang, Claudia H T Tam, Eric S H Lau, Noel Y H Ng, Aimin Yang, Baoqi Fan, Hongjiang Wu, Cadmon K P Lim, Elaine Y K Chow, Andrea O Y Luk and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yingchai ZhangDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-4859
Claudia H T TamDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-0013
Eric S H LauDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1581-5643
Noel Y H NgDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4186-7113
Aimin YangDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2968-1762
Baoqi FanDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6728-419X
Hongjiang WuDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2193-1114
Cadmon K P LimDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5523-9199
Elaine Y K ChowDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4147-3387
Andrea O Y LukDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5244-6069
Alice P S KongDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8927-6764
Wing Hung TamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1189-740X
Juliana C N ChanDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1325-1194
Ronald C W MaDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. rcwma@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1227-803X

Funding

Research Grants Council Research Impact Fund and University Grants Committee Research Grants Matching Scheme R4012-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisInsulin requirements in the human body undergo continuous changes in response to growth and development. We assessed the life course relationships between insulin demand and insulin adequacy.

methodsThree independent Chinese cohorts (204 children, aged [mean ± SD] 7.0 ± 0.5 years; 214 adolescents, aged 15.0 ± 1.8 years; 605 adults, aged 41.5 ± 9.3 years), recruited between 1998 and 2013, underwent OGTT tests. Indices of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion were calculated based on paired glucose/insulin values during fasting, early phase and late phase of OGTT. Insulin demand and insulin adequacy were calculated by standardised major axis (SMA) regression from the paired insulin sensitivity and secretion indices. We derived the natural logarithm of ratio between the exponential functions of insulin adequacy and insulin demand (RAD) index for further evaluating the relationship between insulin demand and adequacy. The risk of abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT) was evaluated by logistic regression analyses. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) analyses, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) indices were used to demonstrate the discriminative value of the RAD method model.

resultsAdolescents had the lowest insulin sensitivity and the highest insulin secretion in all phases (fasting, early and late phase) of the OGTT, as compared with children and adults in each phase (all p<0.001). Adolescents had the highest insulin demand in all phases and lowest insulin adequacy in the fasting phase (p<0.001). In general, adults had the lowest insulin adequacy in both the early phase (p>0.05) and late phase (p<0.001) of the OGTT. Adolescents had negative RAD values irrespective of overweight and obesity, while, in general, children and adults had positive RAD values (p<0.001 between age groups in each of the fasting, early and late phases of the OGTT). Participants with RAD values below the 25th percentile had a higher risk of AGT compared with those above the 25th percentile (fasting-phase OR 1.86 [95% CI 1.18, 2.91]; early-phase OR 1.99 [95% CI 1.24, 3.19]; late-phase OR 2.49 [95% CI 1.57, 3.97]). The late-phase RAD index had the best performance in evaluating the risk of AGT compared with the fasting- and early-phase RAD indices (late-phase AUC-ROC = 0.635 [95% CI 0.583, 0.687]; late-phase NRI = 0.350 [95% CI 0.190, 0.510]; late-phase IDI = 0.033 [95% CI 0.015, 0.050]). CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationThe relationship between insulin demand and insulin adequacy changed throughout the life course. Adolescents had an imbalanced relationship between insulin demand and insulin adequacy, while, in general, children and adults had a balanced relationship. RAD is a novel index that was used to efficiently describe this relationship and evaluate the risk of AGT.

Indexed as

InsulinAdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseChildFastingFemaleGlucose IntoleranceGlucose Tolerance TestHumansInsulin ResistanceInsulin SecretionMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBlood GlucoseInsulinInsulin adequacyInsulin demandInsulin secretionInsulin sensitivityLife courseNatural logarithm of ratio between the exponential functions of insulin adequacy and insulin demandStandardised major axis regression

Identifiers

PMID39611962
PMCPMC11832617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.