Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39611957›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Analysis of factors influencing the choice for a centre for obstetrical and gynaecological patients.

Lucia Ehmann, Vasilena Sultova, Lisa Henkel, Henrik Höhn, Alexander Tamalunas, Eileen Tremmel, Sarah Meister, Susanne Beyer, Christina Seifert, Teresa Starrach and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lucia EhmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Lucia.ehmann@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Vasilena SultovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Lisa HenkelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Henrik HöhnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Alexander TamalunasDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eileen TremmelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Sarah MeisterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Susanne BeyerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Christina SeifertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Teresa StarrachDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Udo JeschkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-3235
Sven MahnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Thomas Kolben *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Lennard Schröder *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to analyse the factors that influence patients` choice of obstetric and gynaecological medical centre.

methodsPatients attending the gynaecological and obstetric outpatient department (gyn./obs.) at a large tertiary university hospital were asked to voluntarily complete an anonymous 34-item-questionnaire on factors influencing their choice of medical centre at a large tertiary university hospital. Apart from epidemiological factors the preferences were analysed using a Likert scale of 1-5 (1 least, 5 most). Between 10/2023 and 04/2024, 445 outpatients (170 gynaecological, 275 obstetric) were included.

resultsIn both outpatient departments (gynaecological/obstetric), the most important factors (4&5/5 possible points) were considered to be clear communication (90%/92%), sufficient time for consultation with the medical staff (90%/90%), friendly care (89%/92%), good professional qualifications (86%/89%), treatment according to the latest findings (85%/86%) and empathy (83%/91%). The following factors were considered less important: Doctor's degree was considered important by only 31%/28%, appearance by 32%/35%, internet rating by 41%/36% and professional background by 35%/38% of patients. Regarding organisational structures, medical care was most important (91%/93%), followed by availability by telephone or e-mail (88%/82%), clear communication of possible costs (79%/76%) and organisation of consultations (76%/69%). Less important were short waiting times (67%/63%), flexible opening hours (63%/56%), the facilities (46%/68%) and the location (43%/66%).

conclusionPatients often prioritise interpersonal factors when choosing a centre for medical treatment, external factors such as academic qualifications or organisational issues appear to be less important. While it is unsurprising that the best medical treatment is of paramount importance, the other findings can help to increase patients´ satisfaction and experience of the treatment.

Indexed as

GynecologyAdolescentAdultAgedChoice BehaviorCommunicationEmpathyFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansMiddle AgedObstetricsObstetrics and Gynecology Department, HospitalPatient PreferencePhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesChoice of centre for treatmentGynaecologyObstetricsPatients´ satisfaction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.