Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39611933›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024

Social Determinants of Health Associated with Cholangiocarcinoma Risk in High-Risk Areas of Thailand: A Case-Control Study.

Pranom Khuanthong, Nopparat Songserm, Comsun Thongchai, Wilawun Chada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pranom KhuanthongDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0001-3233-1491
Nopparat SongsermDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3741-367X
Comsun ThongchaiDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5717-1834
Wilawun ChadaDepartment of Community Health, Faculty of Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9201-3380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis case-control study sought to explore the social determinants of health (SDH) associated with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) risk in high-incidence regions of Thailand.

methodsThe research was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 assessed the prevalence, context, and conditions among at-risk populations for CCA in Yasothon, located in Northeast Thailand. This phase utilized a survey-based research design, employing verbal screening methods to categorize individuals into risk groups (at-risk vs. not at-risk). Phase 2 aimed to identify the SDH associated with CCA risk through a case-control study. Of 496 recruited participants, 238 cases of subjects were at risk of CCA, and 258 controls were not at risk of CCA. Data were collected using structured questionnaires. Multiple logistic regression was employed to analyze the factors associated with CCA risk.

resultsThe study revealed that 48.00% of participants were at risk for CCA, with 32.06% having a history of liver fluke eggs detected in their feces. Despite this, only 45.40% of participants engaged in adequate preventive behaviors. Analysis of SDH among the cases identified significant challenges, including high levels of poverty (49.14%), food security (52.22%), social exclusion (48.82%), inadequate housing (50.22%), and overall SDH burden (53.42%). In contrast, relatively lower levels of health inequality (48.78%) and unfavorable working conditions (51.65%) were observed. Multivariate analysis indicated that overall SDH was a significant risk factor for CCA (AOR=1.63; 95% CI: 1.09-2.46), while perceived disease severity (AOR=0.57; 95% CI: 0.39-0.83) and safe working conditions (AOR=0.61; 95% CI: 0.42-0.90) were protective factors.

conclusionImproving CCA prevention behaviors should focus on enhancing perceived severity and addressing the relevant SDH.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaSocial Determinants of HealthAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrognosisRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesThailandCase-control studycholangiocarcinomaHigh-risk areasOpisthorchis viverriniSocial Determinants of Health

Identifiers

PMID39611933
PMCPMC11996089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.