ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024
Bioinformatics Examination of Glioblastoma Identifies a Potential Panel of Therapeutic Biomarkers.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGlioblastoma, previously recognized as glioblastoma multiform (GBM), is the most aggressive and most common type of cancer that originates in the brain and has a very poor prognosis for survival. Glioblastoma, as one of the lethal cancers of the brain, is important to be studied in terms of molecular exploration.
methodsBioinformatics approaches could be a promising complementary study for identifying more robust biomarkers. This study evaluates the gene expression profile of normal brain endothelial cells versus glioblastoma tumor cells with positive CD3 in more depth by applying R Studio and Cytoscape and its plug-ins.
resultsA network of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) introduced promising candidates comprised of TP53, EGFR, FN1, JUN, and CDC42 and their related biological processes. Comprised of differentially expressed genes, this panel's dysregulation could significantly affect the stability of the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Moreover, previous studies have validated these genes' relevance to this cancer type.
conclusionIn conclusion, the molecular profile of glioblastoma aids in drug targeting following thorough validation assessments. Five key genes and their related biological processes are possible drug targets to control glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.