Trial reportAnnals of hematology2025
Digital PCR (dPCR) is able to anticipate the achievement of stable deep molecular response in adult chronic myeloid leukemia patients: results of the DEMONSTRATE study.
Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Companion Diagnostics in Clinical Therapy: Current Applications and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
- Tracking leukemic residuals: dissecting the inverse relationship between CD26+ stem cells and extracellular BCR::ABL1 transcript in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).Stem cells translational medicine · 2025Article
- MicroRNA Signatures in Cardiometabolic Disorders as a Next-Generation Diagnostic Approach: Current Insight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Assessment of Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia In Vitro Models Variability: Insights Into Extracellular Vesicles.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Duplex digital PCR assay on microfluidic chamber arrays for total HIV DNA reservoir quantification in persons with HIV.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Different In Vitro Models of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Show Different Characteristics: Biological Replicates Are Not Biologically Equivalent.Cell biology international · 2025Article
- Genetic Profiling of Acute and Chronic Leukemia via Next-Generation Sequencing: Current Insights and Future Perspectives.Hematology reports · 2025Review
- Digital droplet PCR-based detection and quantification of ovine papillomavirus DNA from the vaginal virobiota of healthy mares.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The biology of chronic myeloid leukemia: an overview of the new insights and biomarkers.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is marked by the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene. Monitoring tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy response is crucial for treatment management, thus, limitations in Reverse Transcription quantitative PCR's (RT-qPCR) accuracy and sensitivity led to the exploration of alternative methods like digital PCR (dPCR). This study evaluated dPCR efficacy in detecting Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in CML patients undergoing TKI therapy. 79 CML patients were enrolled (NP 3809 clinical trial), with samples analysed using both methods. The achievement and stability of Deep Molecular Response (DMR) were assessed over a 2-year period following the first DMR achievement. A comparative statistical analysis of MRD and DMR attainment, stability, and potential TFR achievement using both RT-qPCR and dPCR was conducted, supported by chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. In 69/79 patients, dPCR either anticipated or coincided DMR achievement as compared to RT-qPCR. Among them, 52/69 achieved a stable DMR according to RT-qPCR, while 44/69 according to dPCR. Thus, dPCR capability to anticipate or coincide the achievement of a stable DMR resulted with p = 0.0012 and p = 0.0017, respectively. Transcript type and TKI choice did not influence DMR achievement or stability by either method. These findings highlight dPCR as a sensitive and accurate tool for monitoring MRD in CML patients, providing information for treatment management decisions, and potentially enhancing the selection of candidates for treatment-free remission. Further standardization of dPCR methodologies is warranted to leverage their benefits in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.