ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Investigating the effects of table movement and sag on optical surrogate-driven respiratory-guided computed tomography.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- How reliable is deep inspiration breath hold at CT simulation? Clinical impact of surface-guided breathing training in breast cancer radiotherapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- A novel respiratory surrogate system with table motion correction and visual feedback for computed tomography.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Surface-guided breathing signal integration in breathing-adapted intelligent 4D computed tomography: prototype implementation and comparison with an infrared marker-based system.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Investigating the effects of table movement and sag on optical surrogate-driven respiratory-guided computed tomography.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRespiratory-guided computed tomography (CT) typically employs breathing motion surrogates to feed image reconstruction or visual breathing coaching. Our study aimed to assess the impact of table movements and table sag on the breathing curves recorded in four-dimensional (4D) CT and deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) CT.
methodsFor breathing curve measurements, static and dynamic phantom scenarios were used. Breathing curves were recorded using three different surrogate systems and the impact of table sag due to weights of up to 130 kg was analyzed and compared to a non-weighted setting, respectively. The calibration procedure of the system used as an input for the visual coaching device used for clinical DIBH CT scans was adapted. We evaluated corresponding breathing curves acquired during DIBH and 4DCT scans of altogether 70 patients using various stability metrics.
resultsThe various surrogate systems showed consistent table sag measurements below 4 mm, even under loads up to 130 kg, compared to a reference scan conducted without additional weight. Higher weight loads were related to steeper table sag fall-offs towards the deepest table position. For DIBH CT scans, the visual guidance was heavily affected by artifacts. This resulted in breathing threshold limits, which could not be achieved by 48% (n = 21) of the, respectively, examined patients. Using the new calibration workflow, the baseline drift was compensated better and 90% (n = 20) of the addressed patients stayed within the thresholds. The evaluated table sag in clinical 4DCT scans (n = 29) stayed below 3 mm compared to the non-weighted situation.
conclusionTable movement and sag can impact breathing curves recorded by different surrogate systems. Correcting table movement and sag artifacts is crucial for reliable breathing curve acquisition in respiratory-guided CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.