Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39611761›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2025

Understanding inequities in access to diabetes technologies in children and young people with type 1 diabetes: Qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives and views.

Rachel Dlugatch, David Rankin, Mark Evans, Nick Oliver, Sze May Ng, Julia Lawton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel DlugatchUsher Institute, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David RankinUsher Institute, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5835-3402
Mark EvansInstitute of Metabolic Science and Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Nick OliverImperial College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3525-3633
Sze May NgFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3449-0541
Julia LawtonUsher Institute, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8016-7374

Funding

Diabetes UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe explored healthcare professionals' perceptions and understandings of the factors and considerations underlying inequities in technology access in children and young people (CYP) with type 1 diabetes.

methodsWe interviewed (n = 29) healthcare professionals working in paediatric diabetes in England recruited from (n = 15) purposively selected sites. We analysed data thematically.

resultsInterviewees highlighted multiple, often overlapping barriers to accessing technology faced by CYP with type 1 diabetes from deprived and/or ethnic minority backgrounds. They described the impacts of deprivation on technology uptake, together with the complex social, ethnic and cultural factors that could also reinforce disparities in technology access. Interviewees further highlighted staffing shortfalls as a significant barrier to supporting CYP to use technology, especially those from under-represented groups who they perceived as requiring more staff time to be trained to use technology. While interviewees suggested that unconscious bias has become less prominent, they reported being less likely to recommend technology (especially pumps) to CYP/caregivers who they feared would not use it safely and effectively (e.g. those with low literacy levels). Interviewees also highlighted geographical variability in the technology commissioning process (a 'postcode lottery').

conclusionsOur findings suggest that without targeted interventions, technology inequities may continue to persist amongst CYP from the most and least deprived areas and from white and ethnic minority groups in the United Kingdom. Additionally, our findings suggest that closing the technology gap will require large-scale governmental and health policies aimed at fostering socioeconomic, ethnic and cultural equality alongside targeted measures to improve technology accessibility.

Indexed as

Continuous Glucose MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Healthcare DisparitiesHealth PersonnelInsulin Infusion SystemsAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentsQualitative ResearchSocial DeprivationSocioeconomic Factorschildren and young peoplehealthcare professionalsinequalityqualitative researchtype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39611761
PMCPMC11929559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.