ArticleMedical physics2025
Optical Automatic Contour Tracing (O-ACT) - A novel optical image-guided contour tracing method for electron beam shaping.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElectron therapy, vital for treating skin lesions and superficial tumors, demands precise electron cutouts to ensure accurate dose delivery. Traditional manual tracing methods introduce uncertainties and inefficiencies, necessitating innovative solutions for custom block creation. PURPOSE: To introduce and validate the Optical Automatic Contour Tracing (O-ACT) method, enhancing electron cutout generation's accuracy and efficiency through optical imaging and software automation.
methodsUtilizing a 3D-printed holder, a centrally-mounted charge-coupled device (CCD) camera on the electron applicator secured two distinct perspective images of the skin's contour at varying heights. Through image binarization and skeletonization, we identified the clinical target contour's region-of-interests (ROIs) in each setup image. Employing distances from each ROI's center, assessed at 5-degree intervals from both images, we reconstructed the target contour on the skin. The magnification factor, set at a 95 cm source-to-point distance, determined the final cutout shape. We crafted an in-house software in MATLAB for camera calibration and image processing and juxtaposed our results against the standard clinical cutout from the treatment planning system (TPS) using a correlation coefficient based on masked binary images' mutual information. Additionally, we performed dosimetric evaluations using abstract shapes to compare O-ACT with other methods.
resultsOur methodology yielded cutout shapes exhibiting remarkable alignment with the TPS clinical cutout. O-ACT demonstrated superior precision in generating cutout shapes that closely align with the contours in TPS, improving upon other methods in terms of adaptability to patient body shapes and contour accuracy. Dosimetric evaluations showed minimal differences between methods, with O-ACT providing slightly more consistent results. Dose profile analyses in penumbra regions indicated O-ACT's improved accuracy compared to conventional methods.
conclusionsPushing the boundaries of traditional practices, our O-ACT offers a more accurate, efficient, and reproducible method for custom electron cutout creation from clinical setup images. This innovation promises not only to streamline clinical workflow but also to potentially uplift clinical outcomes in radiation oncology by providing more accurate patient-specific treatment accessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.