ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2025
Laparoscopic lateral pancreaticojejunostomy in the current era: A narrative review.
Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of early outcomes in laparoscopic and open surgery for chronic pancreatitis: a retrospective study.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractChronic pancreatitis is a benign disease which causes recurrent abdominal pain and loss of pancreatic function. Lateral pancreaticojejunostomy (LPJ) is a commonly performed drainage procedure for this condition. While usually performed through an open approach, there have been few cases of laparoscopic approaches for this condition. A literature review was conducted to understand the current status of laparoscopic longitudinal pancreatojejunostomy (LLPJ). We conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library to find the articles published until 1 st October 2023. We excluded studies involving paediatric patients or robotic assisted surgeries. Our evaluation focussed on pain relief scores, morbidity, hospital stay length, mortality rates and the development of endocrine and exocrine deficiencies in the patients. The patients in the analysis had a mean age of 36.5 and a male to female ratio of 1.4:1. The mean main pancreatic duct diameter was 11.5 mm. Tropical pancreatitis was identified as the primary cause. The surgical procedure was performed using 4 ports with minimal bleeding and a 13% morbidity rate. The conversion rate was 15%. The average operative time was 260 min and the mean hospital stay was 5.7 days. The results for pain control were excellent, as 90% of patients did not report pain in most series at the end of 3 years. The laparoscopic surgical management of chronic calcific pancreatitis with LPJ offers a safe and effective solution for pain relief in carefully chosen patients. However, further comprehensive studies with large sample sizes are essential to establish a more conclusive comparison between LLPJ and open surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.