ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Control of iron acquisition by multiple small RNAs unravels a new role for transcriptional terminator loops in gene regulation.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SamT, a novel peptide modulator of a two-component system revealed by the specific activation of a small RNA in Enterobacteriaceae.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Small RNAs (sRNAs) controlling gene expression by imperfect base-pairing with mRNA(s) are widespread in bacteria. They regulate multiple genes, including genes involved in iron homeostasis, through a wide variety of mechanisms. We previously showed that OmrA and OmrB sRNAs repress the synthesis of the Escherichia coli FepA receptor for iron-enterobactin complexes. We now report that five additional sRNAs, namely RprA, RybB, ArrS, RseX and SdsR, responding to different environmental cues, also repress fepA, independently of one another. While RprA follows the canonical mechanism of pairing with the translation initiation region, repression by ArrS or RseX requires a secondary structure far upstream within the long fepA 5' untranslated region. We also demonstrate a dual action of SdsR, whose 5'-part pairs with the fepA translation initiation region while its 3'-end behaves like ArrS or RseX. Strikingly, mutation analysis shows a key role for the loops of these sRNAs' intrinsic terminators in the regulation. Furthermore, regulation depends on both the Hfq chaperone and the RNase E endonuclease. Overall, our data strongly suggest that FepA levels must be tightly controlled under a variety of conditions and highlight the diversity of mechanisms that underly the regulation of gene expression by sRNAs in bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.