ArticleHuman brain mapping2024
Tract-Specific White Matter Hyperintensities Disrupt Brain Networks and Associated With Cognitive Impairment in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A cross-sectional study of autonomic dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease and vascular parkinsonism.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Strategic locations of white matter hyperintensities associated with cognitive impairment across the cognitive spectrum among rural older adults: a population-based study.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Mild Traumatic Brain Injury as a Heterogeneous Neurological Disorder: Definition, Epidemiology, Neurobiology, and Clinical Course.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2026Review
- Long-term impact of white matter hyperintensities and amyloid beta on thalamic subregions in cerebral small vessel disease: A prospective cohort study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is considered to initiate cerebrovascular pathology, involving in the development of multiple forms of neurodegeneration. However, it is unknown the relationships between imaging marker of cerebrovascular injury (white matter hyperintensity, WMH), its load on white matter tract and disrupted brain dynamics with cognitive function in mild TBI (mTBI). MRI data and neuropsychological assessments were collected from 85 mTBI patients and 52 healthy controls. Between-group difference was conducted for the tract-specific WMH volumes, white matter integrity, and dynamic brain connectivity (i.e., fractional occupancies [%], dwell times [seconds], and state transitions). Regression analysis was used to examine associations between white matter damage, brain dynamics, and cognitive function. Increased WMH volumes induced by mTBI within the thalamic radiation and corpus callosum were highest among all tract fibers, and related with altered fractional anisotropy (FA) within the same tracts. Clustering identified two brain states, segregated state characterized by the sparse inter-independent component connections, and default mode network (DMN)-centered integrated state with strongly internetwork connections between DMN and other networks. In mTBI, higher WMH loads contributed to the longer dwell time and larger fractional occupancies in DMN-centered integrated state. Every 1 mL increase in WMH volume within the left thalamic radiation was associated with a 47% increase fractional occupancies, and contributed to 65.6 s delay in completion of cognitive processing speed test. Our study provided the first evidence for the structural determinants (i.e., small vessel lesions) that mediate the spatiotemporal brain dynamics to cognitive impairments in mTBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.