Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39611222›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Surgical outcomes of women undergoing radical resection of deep endometriosis of the sacral plexus: A prospective cohort study.

Gernot Hudelist, Ezgi Darici Kurt, Gábor Szabó, Dominika Miklos, Theresa Hudelist, Attila Bokor

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Head-to-head prospective comparison of diagnostic accuracy of preoperative ultrasonography and MRI in patients undergoing surgery for deep endometriosis using #Enzian classification.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gernot HudelistDepartment of Gynecology, Center for Endometriosis, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9424-2208
Ezgi Darici KurtDepartment of Gynecology and IVF, Acibadem University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9570-1165
Gábor SzabóDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Endometriosis, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Dominika MiklosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Endometriosis, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Theresa HudelistParacelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Attila BokorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Endometriosis, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9416-2438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgical resection of sacral plexus endometriosis (SPE) is contemplated in severely symptomatic patients not responding to medical or hormonal therapy. However, there is only limited data on the effects of surgery on pain and neurological symptoms. This study aims to report on the surgical outcomes in terms of pain and neurological symptom reduction in women undergoing surgical resection of SPE. MATERIAL AND

methodsThirty premenopausal patients with histologically confirmed SPE who underwent surgical resection of the disease between 2018 and 2024 were included in this multicenter prospective analysis. The primary outcome was the change in neurological symptoms reflected by sacral radiculopathy including dysaesthesia, paraesthesia, hyperaesthesia, and pain. The secondary outcome was post-surgical morbidity reflected by rates of major intra- and postoperative complications.

resultsAll patients exhibited DE affecting the sacral roots S1-S4, whereas no case of isolated supracardinal sciatic nerve involvement was observed. Out of 30 patients, one was lost to follow-up leaving 29 patients for final analysis. Six (20%) of the 30 patients underwent partial resection of the sacral root because of endometriotic infiltration of the nerval tissue. In all other patients, dissection and shaving with cold scissors were sufficient to remove DE affecting the sacral root. Dysaesthesia was observed in 13/30 (43.3%), paraesthesia in 16/30 (53.3%), hyperaesthesia in 5/30 (16.7%), and secondary motor dysfunction in 4/30 (13.3%), preoperatively. The mean follow-up interval was 25.5 ± 20.2 months showing an overall improvement in sacral radiculopathy in 93.1% (27/29) of the patients. A significant decrease in numeric rating scale (NRS) scores of dysaesthesia (p = 0.003), paraesthesia (p ≤ 0.001) and hyperaesthesia (p = 0.068) were observed post-surgically. Equally, reduced pain symptoms including dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and dyschezia (all p ≤ 0.001) with a relevant increase in post-surgical quality of life scores (p ≤ 0.001) were recorded. De novo hyperaesthesia and paraesthesia occurred in 6.8% (2/29) and 3.4% (1/29) of the patients, respectively. Major Clavien-Dindo grade III complications occurred in 13.3% (4/30) of the cases.

conclusionsRadical resection of symptomatic deep endometriosis affecting the sacral plexus reduces neurological and pain symptoms and leads to an increase in quality of life but is associated with high surgical morbidity.

Indexed as

EndometriosisLumbosacral PlexusAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTreatment Outcomedeep endometriosismorbidityquality of liferadical resectionsacral plexus; neurological and pain symptoms

Identifiers

PMID39611222
PMCPMC11683532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.