Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39611174›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Monitoring vancomycin blood concentrations reduces mortality risk in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV database.

Huaidong Peng, Yuantong Ou, Ruichang Zhang, Ruolun Wang, Deliang Wen, Qilin Yang, Xiaorui Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huaidong Peng *Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuantong Ou *Department of Critical Care, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ruichang Zhang *Department of Critical Care, Guangzhou Twelfth People' Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Ruolun WangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Deliang WenDepartment of Critical Care, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qilin YangDepartment of Critical Care, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaorui LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence and mortality of severe Gram-positive cocci infections are particularly high in intensive care units (ICUs). Vancomycin remains the treatment of choice for severe infections caused by Gram-positive cocci, particularly methicillin-resistant Methods: Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database for a retrospective cohort analysis of critically ill patients receiving intravenous vancomycin treatment. The primary outcome was the 28 day mortality rate. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to match the baseline characteristics between patients in the TDM group and the non-TDM group. The relationship between 28 day mortality and vancomycin TDM in the critically ill cohort was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Validation of the primary outcomes was conducted by comparing the PSM model and the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The robustness of the conclusion was subsequently verified by subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Results: Data for 18,056 critically ill patients who met the study criteria were collected from the MIMIC-IV database. Of these, 7,451 patients had at least one record of vancomycin blood concentration monitoring, which we defined as the TDM group. The TDM group exhibited a 28 day mortality rate of 25.7% (1,912/7,451) compared to 16.2% in the non-TDM group (1,723/10,605). After PSM, 4,264 patients were included in each of the TDM and non-TDM groups, with a 28 day mortality rate of 20.0% (1,022/4,264) in the TDM group and 26.4% (1,126/4,264) in the non-TDM group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed a significantly lower 28 day mortality risk in the TDM group when compared to the non-TDM group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79, 0.93; Conclusion: This cohort study showed that monitoring vancomycin blood concentrations is associated with a significantly lower 28 day mortality rate in critically ill patients, highlighting the importance of routinely performing vancomycin TDM in these patients.

Indexed as

critically ill patientsmimic ivmortalitytherapeutic drug monitoringvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID39611174
PMCPMC11602295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.