ArticleAEM education and training2024
Development and Initial Validity Evidence for a Pregnancy Disclosure and Options Counseling Checklist in Emergency Medicine.
Article in AEM education and training, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Initial Validity Evidence for a Pregnancy Disclosure and Options Counseling Checklist in Emergency Medicine.AEM education and training · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many patients first learn of a pregnancy in the emergency department (ED). However, limited ED physician knowledge in pregnancy disclosure and options counseling may contribute to challenges in patient care and potential missed opportunities for timely access to reproductive care. No standardized instruments exist to teach or assess this important communication skill for the ED physicians. This study aimed to develop and collect validity evidence for a checklist for effective pregnancy disclosure and options counseling by ED physicians in an environment with unrestricted access to comprehensive reproductive care. Methods: A prospective checklist creation and validity evidence collection study was conducted, involving literature review, expert input through a modified Delphi process, and pilot testing with ED faculty and residents at an urban academic medical center. We structured the validity evidence collection process using Messick's criteria for construct validity, addressing content, response process, internal structure, and relations to other variables. Data analysis focused on collecting validity evidence, including inter-rater reliability and participant performance assessment based on faculty or resident status. Results: The study resulted in a final 17-item checklist for pregnancy disclosure and options counseling in the ED. Pilot testing with 20 participants (eight faculty members and 12 residents) revealed high overall inter-rater reliability with almost perfect agreement (kappa = 0.81) and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). Checklist scores showed no significant difference across standardized patients, indicating consistency. Faculty members outperformed residents, suggesting concurrent validity based on levels of clinical experience. Conclusions: Preliminary validity evidence supports the use of this novel checklist to assess physician competency in pregnancy disclosure and options counseling in the ED. Given the frequency of new pregnancy encounters in the ED and the dynamic changes to pregnant patients' reproductive rights, enhancing physician education in these areas is critical for optimizing patient care and autonomy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.