ArticleCureus2024
Efficacy of Different Beta Blockers in Reducing Mortality in Heart-Failure Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: "Effect of Bisoprolol Versus Other Beta-Blockers on Glycemic Control and Metabolic Parameters in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study".Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- Gut Microbiota and Cardiovascular Diseases: Unraveling the Role of Dysbiosis and Microbial Metabolites.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Effects of bisoprolol combined with torasemide on cardiac electrophysiology in patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the comparative efficacy of different beta blockers bisoprolol, carvedilol, and metoprolol in reducing mortality and hospitalizations among 120 heart-failure (HF) patients. The sample had an equal gender distribution (50% male, 50% female) with a mean age of 69.28 years. Baseline characteristics, such as systolic blood pressure (mean: 134.36 mmHg) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (mean: 40.24%), were comparable across the treatment groups. Patients were treated with either bisoprolol (30%), carvedilol (30%), or metoprolol (40%) for an average of 27.54 weeks. The study utilized Poisson and negative binomial regression models to assess hospitalization rates, and chi-square tests to compare mortality outcomes. Results revealed that mortality was 44.2% across the entire cohort, with no significant differences between the three beta-blocker groups (p = 0.301). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in hospitalizations (p = 0.276) or ICU admissions (p = 0.797). However, patients on bisoprolol and carvedilol exhibited a slight improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and LVEF, though this was not statistically significant (p = 0.145 and p = 0.477, respectively). Side effects, including bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension, were noted in 32.5%, 21.7%, and 23.3% of patients, respectively. These findings suggest that all three beta blockers are similarly effective in reducing mortality, though bisoprolol and carvedilol may offer better control of HF symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.