ArticleOncology letters2025
Identification and validation of a novel prognostic model based on anoikis‑related genes in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological cancer prevalent worldwide. Anoikis-related genes (ARGs) are crucial in the progression of cancer and metastasis of tumors. However, their role in AML needs to be clarified. In the present study, differential analysis was performed on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database to identify differentially expressed ARGs (DE-ARGs). Subsequently, a prognostic model for patients with AML was constructed using univariate Cox, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator and multivariate Cox regression analyses. This model was based on four key DE-ARGs [lectin galactoside-binding soluble 1 (LGALS1), integrin subunit α 4 (ITGA4), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and Ras homolog gene family member C (RHOC)]. Independent prognostic factors for AML included prior treatment, age, risk scores and diagnosis. A nomogram was constructed based on these factors to aid clinical decision-making. Furthermore, bone marrow samples were collected from individuals diagnosed with AML and healthy donors to validate the expression of the identified ARGs using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. The mRNA levels of LGALS1 and RHOC were significantly higher, while those of ITGA4 and HGF were significantly lower in patients with AML than in healthy donors (all P<0.05). The results of the present study expands the understanding of the function of ARGs in AML, providing a new theoretical basis for the treatment of AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.