ArticleFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare2024
The success of insulin pump therapy: importance of education of patients and health professionals.
Article in Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Factors Associated With Time to Automated Insulin Delivery System Initiation in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple Daily Injections.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026Article
- Short- and long-term complications of insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a multicenter cross-sectional study from Saudi Arabia.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to investigate the importance of education and re-education for the proper use of the insulin pump (IP) in order to maintain stable glycemic control over an extended period. Methods: The study was designed as a cross-sectional retrospective study. A total of 168 patients participated in a five-day structured education program in a small group. Following the initial education, 42 patients who met the criteria for continuation of IP treatment continued to be monitored every six months (period I). After six years of follow-up (period II) data from 36 patients were taken and analyzed. The data from the IP were downloaded from the IP Paradigm 754 "VEO" (Medtronic Inc., Illinois, USA) on the personal computer via the CareLink Pro software (Medtronic, Inc., Illinois). Results: The number of patients using the bolus calculator (BC+) for at least 50% of all administered boluses remained high in both periods. However, BC+ patients statistically significantly increased their A1C value in period II. The average number of hypoglycemias was statistically significantly increased in the group of BC+ patients in period II compared to period I (p=0.009). The continuous glucose monitors (CGM) were used only in period II, so the number of hypoglycemias in period I were roughly estimated. Conclusions: The long-term success of IP therapy primary depends on the proper use of the device, highlighting the importance of good education and regular re-education for both patients and health professionals. Advanced hybrid technology systems could be particularly in settings with poorly organized healthcare, where re-education is not routinely provided and diabetes control relies heavily on the patient engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.