ReviewChemical science2024
The role of responsive MRI probes in the past and the future of molecular imaging.
Review in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isomerism and Relaxation Properties of Lanthanide(III) Complexes of a Ditopic Ligand with Two DO3A Units Bridged by a Methylene-bis(phosphinate) Spacer.Inorganic chemistry · 2026Article
- Nitroxide-Based Contrast Agents for MRI Cancer Diagnostics: Progress, Limitations, and Perspectives.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Chemical probes for enzyme imaging: challenges in design, synthesis and biomedical applications.Chemical science · 2025Review
- Generation of hTERT-immortalized human mesenchymal stromal cells with optical and magnetic labels for in vivo transplantation and tracking.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Molecular imaging using (nano)probes: cutting-edge developments and clinical challenges in diagnostics.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Beyond fluorodeoxyglucose: Molecular imaging of cancer in precision medicine.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an indispensable tool in biomedical research and clinical radiology today. It enables the tracking of physiological changes noninvasively and allows imaging of specific biological processes at the molecular or cellular level. To this end, bioresponsive MRI probes can greatly contribute to improving the specificity of MRI, as well as significantly expanding the scope of its application. A large number of these sensor probes has been reported in the past two decades. Importantly, their development was done hand in hand with the ongoing advances in MRI, including emerging methodologies such as chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) or hyperpolarised MRI. Consequently, several approaches on successfully using these probes in functional imaging studies have been reported recently, giving new momentum to the field of molecular imaging, also the chemistry of MRI probes. This Perspective summarizes the major strategies in the development of bioresponsive MRI probes, highlights the major research directions within an individual group of probes (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.