ArticlePeerJ2024
Balance training in older adults enhances feedback control after perturbations.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postural Balance and Human Movement: An Integrative Framework for Mechanisms, Assessment, and Functional Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Locomotor savings relies on attentional control of walking in older, but not younger adults.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Wobble-board instability re-orthogonalizes postural geometry in older adults through exogenous constraint.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Integrative neuromuscular training on static and dynamic balance in team sport athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As we age, avoiding falls becomes increasingly challenging. While balance training can mitigate such challenges, the specific mechanisms through which balance control improves remains unclear. Methods: We investigated the impact of balance training in older adults on feedback control after perturbations, focusing on kinematic balance recovery strategies and muscle synergy activation. Twenty older adults aged over 65 underwent short-term (one session) and long-term (3-weeks, 10 sessions) balance training, and their recovery from unpredictable mediolateral perturbations was assessed. Perturbations consisted of 8° rotations of a robot-controlled platform on which participants were balancing on one leg. We measured full-body 3D kinematics and activation of 15 leg and trunk muscles, from which linear and rotational kinematic balance recovery responses and muscle synergies were obtained. Results: Our findings revealed improved balance performance after long-term training, characterized by reduced centre of mass acceleration and (rate of change of) angular momentum. Particularly during the later stage of balance recovery the use of angular momentum to correct centre of mass displacement was reduced after training, decreasing the overshoot in body orientation. Instead, more ankle torque was used to correct centre of mass displacement, but only for perturbations in medial direction. These situation and strategy specific changes indicate adaptations in feedback control. Activation of muscle synergies during balance recovery was also affected by training, specifically the synergies responsible for leg stiffness and ankle torques. Training effects on angular momentum and the leg stiffness synergy were already evident after short-term training. Conclusion: We conclude that balance training in older adults refines feedback control through the tuning of control strategies, ultimately enhancing the ability to recover balance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.