ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Rheumatic Heart Disease Burden: A Comparative Analysis between the United States and the European Union.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Latin America: a contemporary review of epidemiology.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- Infective Endocarditis: A Contemporary Review of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Can transesophageal echocardiography be safely deferred? A low-cost predictive model using D-dimer to exclude left atrial thrombus in treatment-naïve rheumatic mitral stenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Long-Term Changes and Disparities in the Global Burden of Rheumatic Heart Disease between 1990 and 2021: An Analysis Based on the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study.Research in heart yield and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Global burden of rheumatic vs non-rheumatic valvular heart disease, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Global Burden of Pediatric Rheumatic Heart Disease, 1990-2021: Analysis of the GBD 2021 Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Expression profiles and bioinformatic analysis of circular RNA in rheumatic heart disease: potential hsa_circ_0001490 and hsa_circ_0001296 as a diagnostic biomarker.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a major challenge to global health, primarily in low- and middle-income countries. Even though RHD is rare in high-income countries, it still poses a health challenge, yet there is a lack of data on its impact within the highest-income regions. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the epidemiology of RHD in the United States of America (USA) and the European Union (EU). Methods: Data on RHD burden were collected using the Global Disease Burden Study 2021 using the Global Health Data Exchange query tool. Age-standardized rates of incidence (ASIR), prevalence (ASPR), death (ASDR), disability-adjusted life years (ASDALY), years lived with disability (ASYLD), and years of life lost (ASYLL) were collected. Estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) was calculated. Results: In USA in 2021, the ASPR was 123.4/100,000 with a decreasing annual trend of 0.32% since 1993. Between 2021 and 1993, the ASIR decreased from 10.6 to 10.0/100,000 cases. In the EU in 2021, the ASPR was 49.7/100,000 cases, with an annual decreasing trend of 1.6% between 2021 and 1993. Between 2021 and 1993, the ASIR decreased from 7.43 to 4.6/100,000 cases. The changing prevalence and incidence in the US was primarily driven by Florida, Nevada, and Tennessee. There has been a reversal in the burden of RHD since 2007 in the USA. In both regions, there was a significant gender disparity with female predominance. The EU reported higher age-standardized disability-adjusted life years and age-standardized years of life losts than the USA. Conclusions: The varied trends underscore the complexity of RHD epidemiology and the need for region-specific strategies to address this persistent health challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.