Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610965›Full record

ArticleJournal of mid-life health

Evaluation of Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Outpatient Resection of Endometrial Pathologies in a University Hospital in the UK.

Kshitij Jamdade, PapaYaw Opokuansah, Sanjaya Kalkur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mid-life health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kshitij JamdadeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, United Lincolnshire Hospitals, Lincoln, UK.
PapaYaw OpokuansahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Sanjaya KalkurDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Southend University Hospital, Southend, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of outpatient MyoSure procedures and their cost-effectiveness. Design: A retrospective analysis of patients who had outpatient MyoSure procedures from November 2019 to November 2020. Subjects and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from electronic patient records (hysteroscopy reports, clinic notes, clinic letters, and histopathology results) from November 2019 to November 2020 and analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS software. Results: Fifty-eight outpatient MyoSure procedures were performed from November 2019 to November 2020. The mean age was 53.13 years (22-81 years) and the mean body mass index was 29.65 kg/m Conclusions: Outpatient MyoSure procedures are feasible, efficacious, safe, acceptable, and cost-effective. The use of local anesthetic and cervical dilation has been associated with improved success rates.

Indexed as

Endometrial pathologyhysteroscopic morcellationMyoSure™outpatient setting

Identifiers

PMID39610965
PMCPMC11601922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.