ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Advances in 3D printing technology for preparing bone tissue engineering scaffolds from biodegradable materials.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone defect repair materials after bone tumour resection: from structural substitutes to biofunctionalized synergistic therapy.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Study on 3D-printed methacrylated hyaluronic acid/methacrylated carboxymethyl chitosan/curcumin composite scaffolds for jaw bone regeneration.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Croaker Fish Bone-Derived Hydroxyapatite as a Sustainable Source for 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.Marine drugs · 2026Article
- Synchronizing degradation with regeneration: a model-driven framework for designing biodegradable biomaterials in bone tissue engineering.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- From Nature to Innovation: Exploring Natural Biopolymers in 3D Bioprinting for Bone Regeneration.ACS omega · 2026Article
- The role of bioactive molecules in enhancing bone healing in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a review of current approaches and future directions.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Review
- Additive Manufacturing of Engineered Tissue Constructs: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exosome-mediated Piezo1 activation in 3D-printed titanium scaffolds promotes repair of femoral head osteonecrosis.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels: From Swelling-Deswelling Mechanisms to Biomedical Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 3D Printed Patient-Specific Resorbable Bone Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Regeneration.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Biomaterial-based strategies for osteoporosis treatment and bone regeneration: advances and translational challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Smart Healing for Wound Repair: Emerging Multifunctional Strategies in Personalized Regenerative Medicine and Their Relevance to Orthopedics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- In Vitro Osteogenic Stimulation of Human Adipose-Derived MSCs on Biofunctional 3D-Printed Scaffolds.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Improving Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) Properties Using Nanocellulose in Biomedical Applications: Thermal, Mechanical and Biological Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Targeting diabetic foot ulcer pathophysiology: altered signaling pathways and 3D scaffold as an emerging treatment strategy.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional-Printed Biomimetic Scaffolds for Investigating Osteoblast-Like Cell Interactions in Simulated Microgravity: An In Vitro Platform for Bone Tissue Engineering Research.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Reconstruction of a large distal femoral giant cell tumor using a 3D-printed condylar support lattice metal implant and fibular grafts: a novel biomechanical and surgical approach.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Frontier progress and translational challenges of pluripotent differentiation of stem cells.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Advances in 3D-Printed scaffolds for bone defect repair: material strategies and synergistic functional performance.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bone tissue engineering (BTE) provides an effective repair solution by implanting osteoblasts or stem cells into biocompatible and biodegradable scaffolds to promote bone regeneration. In recent years, the rapid development of 3D bioprinting has enabled its extensive application in fabricating BTE scaffolds. Based on three-dimensional computer models and specialized "bio-inks," this technology offers new pathways for customizing BTE scaffolds. This study reviews the current status and future prospects of scaffold materials for BTE in 3D bioprinting. Methods: This literature review collected recent studies on BTE and 3D bioprinting, analyzing the advantages and limitations of various scaffold materials for 3D printing, including bioceramics, metals, natural polymers, and synthetic polymers. Key characteristics like biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and degradation rates of these materials were systematically compared. Results: The study highlights the diverse performances of materials used in BTE scaffolds. Bioceramics exhibit excellent biocompatibility but suffer from brittleness; metals offer high strength but may induce chronic inflammation; natural polymers are biocompatible yet have poor mechanical properties, while synthetic polymers offer strong tunability but may produce acidic by-products during degradation. Additionally, integrating 3D bioprinting with composite materials could enhance scaffold biocompatibility and mechanical properties, presenting viable solutions to current challenges. Discussion: This review summarizes recent advances in 3D bioprinting for BTE scaffold applications, exploring the strengths and limitations of various materials and proposing composite material combinations to improve scaffold performance. By optimizing material selection and combinations, 3D bioprinting shows promise for creating customized scaffolds, offering a new technical route for clinical applications of BTE. This research provides a unique perspective and theoretical support for advancing 3D bioprinting technology in bone regeneration, outlining future directions for BTE materials and 3D bioprinting technology development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.