ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
First implementation and results of online adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer based on CT-Linac combination.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Online adaptive radiotherapy: International strategies for AI-enabled workflow efficiency and radiation therapist-led delivery for sustainable practice.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Development of CBCT-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- CBCT based online daily adaptive treatment improves target coverage with limited benefit for OAR protection in SBRT prostate cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Adapt-on-demand: Enabling flexible and scalable adaptive radiotherapy through workflow automation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Accumulated dose on daily iCBCT for rectal cancer: Effects of inter-fraction bowel cavity motion volume.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Case Report: Innovative radiotherapy strategies in advanced colon cancer with oligometastasis: a case of online adaptive radiotherapy and lattice stereotactic re-irradiation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Potential of margin reduction for cervical cancer radiotherapy in an online adaptive image-guided workflow.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Multimodal chemoradiotherapy including interstitial brachytherapy enhances outcomes in FIGO stage IVA cervical cancer: a focus on tumor control and quality of life.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Article
- Time-saving potential of daily online adaptive proton therapy for head and neck cancers by reducing number of beams.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- CBCT-based Online Adaptive Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Dosimetrical Aspects and Comparison to Non-Adaptive Conventional IGRT.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the dosimetric effectiveness of image-guided radiation treatment (IGRT) and online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) for cervical cancer. As well as survival follow-up was conducted to validated the safety and efficacy of oART. Methods: A total of 15 cervical cancer patients were enrolled. oART was performed on a CT-integrated linear accelerator. The initial plan was revised to include the distribution of IGRT dose using daily fan-beam CT (FBCT) images, after which the distinctions between ART and IGRT in terms of target coverage and organs at risk (OARs) sparing were analyzed. Survival follow-up was conducted to validated the safety and efficacy of oART in this group. Results: PTV Dmax value decreased by 1.23 Gy in the ART plan when compared to that in the IGRT plan; PTV D95 increased by 1.34 Gy; PTV V50 coverage increased by 4.86%; CTV coverage increased by 3.02%; PTV D2cc of the colon, rectum, and small intestine decreased by 1.24 Gy, 1.29 Gy, and 1.12 Gy, respectively. The V10 and V30 of the pelvis increased by 1.27% and 0.56%, respectively, while the V30 of the left and right femoral heads dropped by 2.82% and 3.41%, respectively. Except for the pelvic changes, all other differences were statistically significant (p < 0.01). The average time for the ART procedure was 21.22 min (range: 18.72-24.90 min). The median follow-up time is 28.0 months. Median event-free survival and overall survival were not reached. EFS rate and OS rate at 3 years were 79.4% and 92.9%. Conclusion: Online ART for cervical cancer can minimize the dose of OARs and enhance the target volume coverage significantly when compared to IGRT with satisfied survival time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.