Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610895›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Organic fertilizer increases pumpkin production by improving soil fertility.

Fangfang Ren, Jinxia Zhang, Lin Ding, Rui Zhang, Fuqiang Li, Xuan Li, Tao Zhong, Meng Yin, Runheng Yang, Pengliang Tian and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Improving growth and yield ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Fangfang RenCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Jinxia ZhangCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Lin DingRural Water Conservancy Institute, Gansu Academy for Water Conservancy, Lanzhou, China.
Rui ZhangCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Fuqiang LiCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Xuan LiCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Tao ZhongCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Meng YinCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Runheng YangCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Pengliang TianCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Liangliang DuCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Kaiyuan GanCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Tian YongCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Qirun LiCollege of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Xingrong LiuGeological Hazards Prevention Institute, Gansu Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with long-term and continuous application of large amounts of chemical fertilizers, fertilizers with microbial organic nutrient sources can improve soil environment, increase soil fertility and increase crop yield. In view of the current low soil fertility and poor soil environment leading to low crop yield and instability in the arid regions of northwest China, the effects of organic fertilizer with microbial nutrient sources on soil nutrients and pumpkin yield were studied in 2022 and 2023 in this region. The fertilizer application level was used as control factor, with four treatments of low level (L), medium level (M), high level (H), and a conventional fertilizer control (CK). The results showed that the high application level of organic fertilizer was more beneficial to the growth of pumpkin, and the stem diameter, vine length, and leaf area of pumpkin under H treatment were the highest from 2022 to 2023. Compared to CK, the average soil bulk density was significantly decreased by 8.27-18.51% (P< 0.05); the soil organic carbon, available phosphorus, available potassium, and nitrate nitrogen under H treatment were increased by an average of 32.37%, 21.85%, 18.70%, and 36.97%, respectively. Under different organic fertilizer treatments, the pumpkin yield under M treatment was the highest, reaching 30926.18 kg·ha

Indexed as

organic fertilizerpumpkin yieldsoil bulk densitysoil NPKsoil organic carbon

Identifiers

PMID39610895
PMCPMC11603078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.