Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610874›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2024

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Community-Recruited Individuals at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis: Results From the Youth Mental Health Risk and Resilience Study (YouR-Study).

Kate Haining, Ruchika Gajwani, Joachim Gross, Andrew I Gumley, Stephen M Lawrie, Frauke Schultze-Lutter, Matthias Schwannauer, Peter J Uhlhaas

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Early detection and intervention in at-risk mental states: rationale, structure, and clinical experience from a specialized outpatient service.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kate HainingSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4500-1395
Ruchika GajwaniSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Joachim GrossSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Andrew I GumleySchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Stephen M LawrieDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Frauke Schultze-LutterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-9574
Matthias SchwannauerDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Peter J UhlhaasSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0892-2224

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L011689/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P) individuals are typically recruited from clinical services but the clinical and functional outcomes of community-recruited CHR-P individuals remain largely unclear. The Youth Mental Health Risk and Resilience Study (YouR-Study) obtained a community sample of CHR-P individuals through an online-screening approach and followed-up these individuals for a period of up to 3 years to determine transition rates, persistence of attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS) and functional outcomes. Baseline data were obtained from

Indexed as

clinical high-riskearly detection and interventionlongitudinal outcomespsychosisweb screening

Identifiers

PMID39610874
PMCPMC11604080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.