ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Exposure to brominated flame retardants
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The contribution of phenolic endocrine-disrupting chemicals to breast cancer risk: A comprehensive bioinformatics analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Brominated flame retardants (BFRs) are chemical compounds used to reduce the flammability of various products; some BFRs exhibit endocrine-disrupting properties and can leach into the environment leading to human and wildlife exposure. The mammary gland has specific vulnerability windows during which it is more sensitive to the effects of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs), such as the Objective: The current study aimed to determine if Methods: Dams were exposed to a BFRs mixture (0. 0.06 or 60 mg/kg/day), and mammary cancer was induced in pups using DMBA at post-natal day 46. Tumors onset and growth were monitored, and tumors were characterized using histology and molecular biology. Results: Although BFRs exposure did not significantly affect mammary tumor number or burden, it showed significant delay in mammary tumor onset and growth in BFR-exposed animal. These effects could potentially be due to BFRs' impact on cellular responses, DMBA metabolism, or mammary gland shift of the sensitivity window. Molecular analysis of mammary tumors showed a shift in the ratio of luminal A, luminal B, and (HER2)-enriched tumors, and an increase in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes in BFR-exposed animals. Additionally, BFRs exposure showed lung lesions indicative of inflammation, independent of mammary cancer development. Conclusion: Our study highlights the complex relationship between BFRs exposure and mammary cancer risk, emphasizing the need for further investigation into underlying mechanisms and long-term effects of BFRs on mammary gland development and carcinogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.